If only Michael Steele and other republican leaders would stop cowarding down to Rush, they could begin reforming and repairing this party that once stood for equality, freedom, justice, and affirmative action (a long time ago). Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter (and all of Fox News) exist because they are a reflection of the subtle racism and sexism that exist throughout our country. I wonder if a third more moderate party might eventually split the republican party in two leaving behind their extreme conservative counterparts. I’ve always believed that the 2 party system hasn’t worked, and a strong third party might be just what this country needs. Flow with me on this, what do you think?
Rush Limbaugh… Need I say more!
Posted byDrew G. I. Hart, PhDPosted inChurch, Dominant Culture, Life, Politics, UncategorizedTags:Politics
Published by Drew G. I. Hart, PhD
Rev. Dr. Drew G. I. Hart is an associate professor of theology at Messiah University and has 10 years of pastoral experience prior to teaching. He currently directs Messiah University's "Thriving Together: Congregations for Racial Justice" program and co-hosts Inverse Podcast with Jarrod McKenna, an award-winning peace activist from Australia. Hart is the author of Trouble I've Seen: Changing the Way the Church Views Racism (2016) and Who Will Be A Witness?: Igniting Activism for God's Justice, Love, and Deliverance (2020). And he is also a co-editor and contributor to the recently published book entitled Reparations and the Theological Disciplines: Prophetic Voices for Remembrance, Reckoning, and Repair (Nov. 2023). Hart received bcmPEACE’s 2017 Peacemaker Award, the 2019 W.E.B. Du Bois Award in Harrisburg, PA, and most recently in December 2023 Life Esteem Ministries recognized him in Harrisburg with the Harambee Award for the Nguzo Saba Principle of Umoja—Unity for his faith-based activism and public scholarship in the community. Drew and his family live in Harrisburg, PA. View more posts
Drew G. I. Hart 
I think a blend between the Christian value elements of the republican and the Christian value elements of the Democratic party would make a wonderful third party. However, God is not bound by any party and calls his prophetic people to speak outside of parties at all times, encouraging (and helping by action) or criticizing (and challenging by action). Because the world we live in is fallen and corrupt with power, a political theocracy is not the model for national government on this side of eternity.
I definitely agree with that!!! But I really do wonder what the odds are of a third party ever emerging in our country??? The two party machine is pretty strong, I am not sure it would ever succeed, despite it being a healthy thing. But I am with you, at the end of the day, we God’s people must live as separate and distinct people that speak and embody a more faithful and different alternative to that of which we see in politics and other areas of life.
Others would say: “Ketih Olbermann…need I say more?”
It makes not sense to be so partisan. Take a ong hard look at the merits of what both kinds of people have to say and you’ll come away with a new understanding of things.
The first commenter is right: ultimately things that are man-made have fatal flaws because God’s handiwork is not present.
I challenge you to take six months and do some reading and listening to the other side and challenge yourself to try to engage with the material and see whether or not it has merits.
I have and I can tell you that sometimes liberals are dead right and other times they are dead wrong and the same goes for conservatives.
A Christians we have a different perspective however and we must not forge that.
The only way anyone could see something coming from Keith Olbermann’s mouth as being worthy of consideration is because they stand that far to the “EXTREME” left. And we know what the extreme left believe and how racist they are and have always been… How they push for more financial aide for the killing of the unborn through abortion (knowing that it affects more blacks than most any other race)… How they fight fiercely to maintain a failed school system (further hurting the poor and minorities in the inner cities)… How they demand that welfare be expanded so that more people can be enslaved by it and therefore controlled (again, the poor getting the shaft)…
Need I say more???
Come, let us reason together….
You betray yourself when you speak as you do of Rush Limbaugh – you have never actually listened to him otherwise you would never accuse him of being a racist or a sexist.
I agree with Trinidad, you need to be able to commit yourself to listen to that which you are already needlessly prejudiced against. 6 months is not a bad start. You just might find out how much wisdom and truth is there. There is no shame in accepting truth where ever you can find it. It is to the glory of God to conceal a matter and to the glory of man to seek it out”.
“If you are 20 and not a liberal, you have no heart.
But
If you are 40 and not a conservative, you have no brain.”
Churchill, I believe.
I must have a heart!!! However, I actually grew up most of my life conservative evangelical, and it was not till the latter half of college that i began to question the assumptions I once held as true. While I would never have defended Rush Limbaugh, because I honestly do have problems with him, I did overall, defend conservative ideology. Many of my peers and mentors had conservative slants as well. So the notion that I am the one that needs to engage the other side seems a bit ludicrous. I got to the point that I am at through painful soul searching, asking tough questions, ad much internal debate. How many years did you openly explore the other side looking to learn truth?
Truth is, I am not a true conservative or liberal… liberals think I am conservative, and conservatives think I am liberal. Check my library, and you will see I have read and engaged all kinds of different people with all kinds of perspectives. Freestyle Theology, is all about engaging in dialogue… which means both listening as talking. If you read my actually blog post carefully, I am calling for something “NEW”. And was actually hoping that moderate republicans could be the ones to start it. I think I am the only one presenting not falling into preordained ideology, despite the attacks against me. I prefer dialogue much more than argument, I prefer listening much more than shouting, and I prefer mutual progress and growth over division and stunted communal maturity. I rarely “delete” comments that disagree with me, which would be easy… because I really do want open and honest dialogue, but sometimes I am not sure how much those who differ (on both sides) really want to engage in that discipline. I guess everyone is used to arguing and attacking it’s hard to stop.